Neovascular glaucoma caused by small-cell lung cancer iris metastasis: A case presentation.

Small-cell lung cancer may directly affect the eye by metastatic proliferation or indirectly by paraneoplastic syndromes. The choroid is the most common site for uveal metastasis (90%); however, the iris can be involved in a smaller proportion of cases (incidence <10%). Blurred vision, pain, redness, photophobia, glaucoma, hyphema and visual field defects can arise from this metastatic involvement. The median survival time for patients with iris metastasis is reported to be 4 months. Secondary glaucoma can be managed with topical and oral treatment, transscleral cyclophotocoagulation, laser trabeculoplasty, anti-VEGF, Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS), filtering surgery, shunting surgery or enucleation. A case of primary small-cell lung cancer with iris metastasis is presented. The metastases produced an angle-closure glaucoma, which was refractory to topical treatment. Local radiotherapy was administered, obtaining a good local response.

Neovascular glaucoma with combined retinal vascular occlusion in carotid cavernous fistula.

Carotid cavernous fistulas (CCFs) can present with varied ophthalmic manifestations. The most important vision-threatening complications of CCF include glaucoma and retinal vascular occlusions. We report a case of a man in his early 30s who developed a post-traumatic direct CCF. The patient denied undergoing embolisation therapy. This resulted in aggravation of his condition with onset of combined retinal venous and artery occlusion leading to neovascular glaucoma and severe vision loss. He was treated with medical management followed by diode laser photocoagulation to control intraocular pressure. Diagnostic cerebral angiography done 3 months later showed complete closure of the fistula; hence, no further intervention was advocated. Combined vascular occlusion is a rare vision-threatening occurrence in cases of CCF. Timely intervention with closure of the fistula can prevent the development of vision-threatening complications.

Retinal vein occlusions associated or complicated with glaucoma. Aspects of prediction and paths of progression.

Background and Objectives: The aim of the study is to evaluate prediction factors and progression paths when retinal vein occlusions are associated with preexisting glaucoma or complicated with neovascular glaucoma. Materials and Methods: The study included 111 patients diagnosed with retinal vein occlusions, of whom 21 with preexisting open angle glaucoma and 12 with neovascular glaucoma as complication. The study was conducted from September 2020 to September 2022 in Timisoara, Romania. We assessed intraocular pressure, cup-disc ratio and retinal nerve fiber layer from the moment of retinal vein occlusion diagnosis until at least one year of follow-up, considering these aspects as values of prediction concerning the paths of progression when glaucoma and retinal vein occlusions come together. Results: The mean initial IOP for the affected eyes was higher (15.89 ± 2.73) than for fellow eyes (15.20 ± 3.11), with an increase of the IOP after one year, but with no statistically significant differences for the affected eyes (p=0.116) or for the other eyes (p=0.684), neither for the affected eyes associated with glaucoma in comparison with affected eyes without glaucoma association. The mean cup-disc ratio was higher for the affected eyes in comparison with the fellow eyes (0.4812 ± 0.219 for the affected eyes and 0.4738 ± 0.229 for the fellow ones in cases without associated glaucoma and 0.681 ± 0.157 for the affected eyes and 0.600 ± 0.241 for the fellow eyes in cases with associated glaucoma), with statistical significant differences in the evolution for both groups in comparison with the unaffected eyes (p=0.0056 for the first group and p=0.0003 for the second group). Comparing the evolution of the affected eyes with the preexisting glaucoma and the affected eyes without preexisting glaucoma, no statistical difference has been found (p=0.1104). The mean retinal nerve fiber layer decreased significantly in affected eyes without glaucoma (from 96 ± 14.71 to 89.16 ± 13.07) and in affected eyes with associated glaucoma (from 78.50 ± 4.23 to 75.50 ± 5.83), but with no significant differences (p=0.182). The level of decreasing was significantly more consistent in association with a venous occlusion (p= 0.0001). Conclusions: The findings of the current study fortify the correlation between glaucoma as a risk factor for retinal venous occlusion development, the intraocular pressure and optic nerve cupping as prediction factors in retinal venous occlusions, the association of a well-controlled preexisting glaucoma with no effect on the progression of the retinal venous occlusions and the development of a neovascular glaucoma with a much aggressive and different path of disease progression.

RISK FACTORS FOR SURGERY OR BLINDNESS IN NEOVASCULAR GLAUCOMA EYES TREATED WITH ANTI-VEGF INJECTIONS BY A RETINA SPECIALIST.

PURPOSE: To determine baseline patient characteristics that predict the need for glaucoma surgery or blindness in eyes with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) despite intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with NVG who had not previously received glaucoma surgery and were treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections at the time of diagnosis, from September 8, 2011, to May 8, 2020, at a large, retina subspecialty practice. RESULTS: Of 301 newly presenting NVG eyes, 31% required glaucoma surgery and 20% progressed to no light perception vision despite treatment. Patients with intraocular pressure >35 mmHg ( P < 0.001), two or more topical glaucoma medications ( P = 0.003), worse than 20/100 vision ( P = 0.024), proliferative diabetic retinopathy ( P = 0.001), eye pain or discomfort ( P = 0.010), and new patient status ( P = 0.015) at the time of NVG diagnosis were at a higher risk of glaucoma surgery or blindness regardless of antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. The effect of panretinal photocoagulation was not statistically significant in a subgroup analysis of patients without media opacity ( P = 0.199). CONCLUSION: Several baseline characteristics at the time of presentation to a retina specialist with NVG seem to portend a higher risk of uncontrolled glaucoma despite the use of antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Prompt referral of these patients to a glaucoma specialist should be strongly considered.

Visual prognosis and surgical timing of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation for neovascular glaucoma secondary to diabetic vitrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Evaluate the visual outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation (AGVI) in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) who underwent diabetic vitrectomy and suggest appropriate AGVI timing. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent AGVI due to NVG after diabetic vitrectomy were reviewed. Successful intraocular pressure (IOP) control was defined as an IOP between 6 and 21 mmHg. Visual outcome was compared before NVG diagnosis and after AGVI, and the "favorable" visual outcome was defined as a postoperative deterioration in BCVA of less than 0.3 logMAR units compared to those before the development of NVG. Various factors including surgical timing were evaluated to identify the risk factors associated with unfavorable visual outcome. RESULTS: A total of 35 eyes were enrolled and divided into group 1(medically uncontrolled NVG group, IOP more than 30mmHg, 16 eyes) and group 2(NVG group responded well to the initial non-surgical treatment but eventually required AGVI, 19 eyes). Despite the favorable rate of normalization of post-AGVI IOP (85.7%), 43.8% in Group 1 and 26.3% in Group 2 showed unfavorable visual outcomes. In group 1, delayed surgical timing more than 1 week from the NVG diagnosis showed a significant association with unfavorable visual outcomes (P = 0.041). In group 2, poor patient compliance (follow up loss, refuse surgery) was the main factor of unfavorable visual outcomes. CONCLUSION: When NVG occurs in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy after vitrectomy, physicians should be cautious not to delay the surgical intervention, especially in patients with IOP of 30 or more despite non-surgical treatment. Early AGVI within six days might be necessary to preserve useful vision in these patients.

Two-year outcomes of patients presenting to Sydney Eye Hospital with neovascular glaucoma.

BACKGROUND: Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a sight-threatening condition that is often refractory to treatment. Current management principles are yet to be standardized due to lack of evidence. We studied the interventions used to treat NVG at Sydney Eye Hospital (SEH) and the two-year surgical outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective audit of 67 eyes of 58 patients with NVG from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. Intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number of medications, repeat surgery, recurrent neovascularization, loss of light perception and pain were studied. RESULTS: The average age of the cohort was 59.67 years (SD 14.22). The most common etiologies were proliferative diabetic retinopathy (35 eyes; 52.2%), central retinal vein occlusion (18 eyes; 26.9%) and ocular ischemic syndrome (7 eyes; 10.4%). 70.1% of eyes (47) received vascular endothelial growth factor injections (VEGFI), 41.8% (28 eyes) received pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) and 37.3% (25 eyes) received both prior to or within the first week of presentation to SEH. The most common initial surgical interventions were trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCPC) (36 eyes; 53.7%) and Baerveldt tube insertion (18 eyes; 26.9%). 62.7% of eyes (42 eyes) failed (IOP > 21 or < 6 mmHg for two consecutive reviews, further IOP-lowering surgery or loss of light perception) during follow-up. Initial TSCPC failed in 75.0% (27/36 eyes) compared with 44.4% (8/18 eyes) after Baerveldt tube insertion. CONCLUSION: Our study reinforces the refractory nature of NVG, often despite intensive treatment and surgery. Improvements in patient outcomes may be achieved with earlier consideration of VEGFI and PRP. This study identifies the limitations of surgical interventions for NVG and highlights the need for a standardized management approach.

The mechanism and therapeutic strategies for neovascular glaucoma secondary to diabetic retinopathy.

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a devastating secondary glaucoma characterized by the appearance of neovascular over the iris and the proliferation of fibrovascular tissue in the anterior chamber angle. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is one of the leading causes of NVG. Currently increasing diabetes population drive the prevalence rate of NVG into a fast-rising lane. The pathogenesis underlying NVG makes it refractory to routine management for other types of glaucoma in clinical practice. The combination of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections, anti-glaucoma drugs, surgical intervention as well as blood glucose control is needed. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment in time are crucial in halting the neovascularization process and preserving vision. This review provides an overview of NVG secondary to diabetic retinopathy (DR), including the epidemiology, pathogenesis and management, so as to provide a better understanding as well as potential therapeutic strategies for future treatment.

Neovascular Glaucoma: An Update.

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a severe type of secondary glaucoma with devastating complications and generally poor visual prognosis. NVG is defined by the development of pathological neovessels over the iris and the iridocorneal angle that can block the outflow of aqueous humor, causing elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP). The pathogenesis of NVG is, in most cases, associated with ischemia of the posterior segment, which is most frequently associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy or central retinal vein occlusion. The advanced stages of NVG are by iris and angle neovascularization, angle, and extremely high IOP, accompanied by ocular pain and poor vision. The therapeutic approach of NVG is based on the reduction of retinal ischemia by panretinal photocoagulation. Intravitreal anti-VEGF administration can contribute to the regression of neovascularization, and topical and systemic medications may be necessary for IOP control. However, if medical treatment with these agents is not enough, surgical procedures may be required to lower IOP and prevent glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Early and prompt diagnosis, with identification of the underlying etiology, can improve IOP control and final visual outcome. The aim of this study is to review current knowledge of the pathogenesis and management of NVG.

A Review of Neovascular Glaucoma: Etiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a rare, aggressive, blinding secondary glaucoma, which is characterized by neovascularization of the anterior segment of the eye and leading to elevation of the intraocular pressure (IOP). The main etiological factor is retinal ischemia leading to an impaired homeostatic balance between the angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors. High concentrations of vasogenic substances such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induce neovascularization of the iris (NVI) and neovascularization of the angle (NVA) that limits the outflow of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber and increases the IOP. NVG clinical, if untreated, progresses from secondary open-angle glaucoma to angle-closure glaucoma, leading to irreversible blindness. It is an urgent ophthalmic condition; early diagnosis and treatment are necessary to preserve vision and prevent eye loss. The management of NVG requires the cooperation of retinal and glaucoma specialists. The treatment of NVG includes both control of the underlying disease and management of IOP. The main goal is the prevention of angle-closure glaucoma by combining panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and antiangiogenic therapy. The aim of this review is to summarize the current available knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, and symptoms of NVG and determine the most effective treatment methods.

23G Minimally Invasive Vitrectomy Combined with Glaucoma Drainage Valve Implantation and Phacoemulsification Cataract Extraction for Neovascular Glaucoma Secondary to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy with Vitreous Hemorrhage.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the combined application of 23G minimally invasive vitrectomy, glaucoma drainage valve implantation, and phacoemulsification cataract extraction in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma (NVG) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) combined with vitreous hemorrhage (VH). Methods: Eighty-three patients (91 eyes) with PDR diagnosed as NVG phase III complicated with VH from June 2018 to May 2020 were selected as the study subjects. The subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups: group A was treated with 23G minimally invasive vitrectomy combined with glaucoma drainage valve implantation; group B was given 23G minimally invasive vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification cataract extraction; and group C was treated with 23G minimally invasive vitrectomy combined with glaucoma drainage valve implantation and phacoemulsification cataract extraction. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and iris neovascularization (INV) scores were recorded and compared among the 3 groups before and after operation, and then the postoperative pain relief and complications were observed. Results: Through observation, there was no significant difference in the UCVA, IOP, and INV scores in the 3 groups before operation. After the operation, the UCVA, IOP, and INV scores of the 3 groups were significantly lower than those before operation. After operation, the UCVA of the 3 groups increased first and then decreased, and it improved most significantly in the 3rd month after operation and decreased in the 4th month after operation. There were significant differences in UCVA among the 3 groups at each time point after operation. From the 1st day to the 6th month after operation, the IOP of the 3 groups showed an upward trend, and there was no significant difference among the 3 groups in IOP at each time point after operation. At the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months after operation, the INV score of group A and group B was higher than that of group C. There was no significant difference in the INV score between group A and group B. The incidence of complications was not significantly different among the 3 groups. Conclusion: 23G minimally invasive vitrectomy, glaucoma drainage valve implantation, and phacoemulsification cataract extraction can effectively improve the UCVA, IOP, and INV scores of NVG secondary to PDR with VH, and the combined application of the 3 methods has better security.

Comparisons of the short-term effectiveness and safety of surgical treatment for neovascular glaucoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of the six interventions for neovascular glaucoma. DESIGN: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials and cohort studies which compared the six interventions in neovascular glaucoma were identified using the following databases searched up to 1 September 2020: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science. The quality assessment was conducted by using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The primary outcome measure was the weighted mean differences for intraocular pressure reduction. Secondary one was ORs for success rate. Outcome measures were reported with a 95% CI and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Network meta-analysis was performed using Stata V.15.0. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies involving a total of 1303 patients were included. The types of surgical treatments included Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implant surgery, AGV combined with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (AGV +IVAV), cyclophotocoagulation (CPC), cyclocryotherapy (CCT), trabeculectomy with mitomycin (Trab(MMC)) and Trab(MMC) combined with IVAV (Trab(MMC)+IVAV). Network meta-analysis showed that in comparison with AGV, AGV +IVAV (MD=4.74, 95% CI 1.04 to 8.45) and Trab(MMC)+IVAV (MD=6.19, 95% CI 0.99 to 11.40) showed a favourable effect in intraocular pressure reduction (IOPR) 6 months after surgery. Compared with CCT, AGV (OR=-0.17, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.05), AGV +IVAV (OR=-0.10, 95% CI -3.48 to -1.19), CPC (OR=-0.12, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.05), Trab(MMC) (OR=3.54, 95% CI 1.15 to 10.91) and Trab(MMC)+IVAV (OR=5.78, 95% CI 2.29 to 14.61) showed a superior impact in success rate. The order of efficacy as best intervention ranked as follows: Trab(MMC)+IVAV (IOPR 6 months after surgery, surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA)=88.1), CPC (IOPR 12 months after surgery, SUCRA=81.9), AGV +IVAV (IOPR 12 months after surgery, SUCRA=79.9) and AGV +IVAV (success rate, SUCRA=92.7). Adverse events were also summarised in detail. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of neovascular glaucoma, AGV+IVAV and CPC were more effective in IOPR and success rate than the other four interventions. Additionally, AGV+IVAV is superior to CPC concerning the success rate in the long-term treatment. However, considering the limitations of this review, more high-quality trials, especially those surgical interventions not mentioned in this review, should be carried out in the future to further confirm the current findings.

Comparing Surgical Outcomes in Neovascular Glaucoma between Tube and Trabeculectomy: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcomes between Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) surgery and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C for patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG). DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study at 5 clinical centers in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Patients treated with trabeculectomy or BGI for NVG between April 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019, at 5 clinical centers were recruited. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 20 years and having NVG. The exclusion criteria were eyes with no light perception vision and with previous tube-shunt surgery. If both eyes in the same patient satisfied the inclusion criteria, the eye that was treated first was investigated. We included 100 eyes undergoing BGI surgery and 204 eyes undergoing trabeculectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was surgical success or failure, with failure being defined according to 3 criteria: < 20% reduction of the preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) or criterion A (IOP > 21 mmHg), criterion B (IOP > 17 mmHg), or criterion C (IOP > 14 mmHg). Cases of reoperation, a loss of light perception vision, or hypotony were also considered failures. RESULTS: The probability of success was significantly higher in patients undergoing BGI surgery than in those receiving trabeculectomy for criteria A (P < 0.01) and B (P = 0.01). Trabeculectomy was significantly associated with surgical failure in the multivariable analysis for criterion A (hazard ratio, 1.70) and criterion B (hazard ratio, 1.50). The overall incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the 2 groups. Reoperations for glaucoma were required significantly more frequently in the trabeculectomy group than in the BGI surgery group (20.1 % vs. 5.0%; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Baerveldt glaucoma implant surgery had a higher success rate compared with trabeculectomy in patients with NVG for a target IOP < 21 mmHg or < 17 mmHg. The rates of postoperative complications were similar between both surgical procedures. Additional glaucoma surgery was required more frequently after trabeculectomy than after BGI surgery.

The pathological association between the anterior eye segment and the retina in a murine model of neovascular glaucoma.

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is caused by the formation of new blood vessels in the angle, iris, and cornea in retinal ischemic disease, such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO), which can reduce the visual acuity. However, the pathophysiological symptoms of NVG are still not well understood because there is no model for the formation of NVG in the angle, iris, and cornea. The aim of this study was to investigate the involvement of NVG during ischemic disease, in a murine model of retinal ischemia. We evaluated the changes of the intraocular pressure (IOP) and pathological symptoms in the anterior eye segment and retina in this model, and the changes in the RNA or protein expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibrosis-related factors were analyzed in the retina and cornea by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction or western blot, respectively. Furthermore, we examined the changes in IOP after intravitreal injection of an anti-VEGF antibody. First, NVG formed in the retinal ischemic murine model, and the IOP was elevated in mice with NVG formation. Interestingly, VEGF expression was decreased in the retina but increased in the cornea in the murine model of NVG. On the other hand, fibrosis-related factors were increased in the retina and also significantly increased in the cornea in NVG. Moreover, the administration of anti-VEGF antibody immediately after vessel occlusion suppressed the increase in IOP, but administration at 7 days after vessel occlusion accelerated the increase in IOP. These findings suggest that the formation of NVG may be correlated with the pathological symptoms of retinal ischemic disease, via changes in VEGF and fibrosis-related factor expression.

Neovascular glaucoma following Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy: a rare complication in a postvitrectomised patient with diabetes.

To describe a case of acute-onset neovascular glaucoma (NVG) after a neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy in a diabetic vitrectomized eye of a patient with severe systemic and ocular comorbidities. A man in his 50s underwent a Nd:YAG capsulotomy for visually significant posterior capsular opacification with a previous history of vitrectomy with silicone oil in situ for diabetic retinopathy. He had systemic and ocular comorbidities implicating an advanced ischaemic status, both systemically and locally. Five days post Nd:YAG capsulotomy, extensive neovascularisation of the iris and angles was noted. Despite maximum antiglaucoma medication, an evisceration ensued due to intractable NVG. This case report highlights the importance of irreversible complications after a seemingly simple capsulotomy in eyes with advanced ocular conditions and systemic comorbidities necessitating extreme caution.

Retrospective analysis of secondary enucleation for uveal melanoma after plaque radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Plaque brachytherapy (PRT) is widely accepted as an effective globe-conserving treatment modality for UM. However, local treatment failure and complications lead to the enucleation of irradiated eyes. We conducted this study to explore the causes and long-term prognosis for UM patients who accepted secondary enucleation after plaque radiotherapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Data of patients who underwent secondary enucleation for UM after plaque radiotherapy, from July 2007 to July 2019, at Beijing Tongren Hospital were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess the probability of indications, metastasis, and metastasis-related death. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze associations of the prognostic factors. RESULTS: Eight hundred and eighty patients were clinically diagnosed with uveal melanoma and initially treated by iodine-125 plaque radiotherapy, 132 of whom underwent secondary enucleation and pathological examination in the same hospital. Fifty-two (39.4%) eyes were enucleated simply because of uncontrollable neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Forty-four (33.3%) patients suffered from tumor recurrence. Tumor non-response occurred in 18 (13.6%) cases. Ten (7.6%) eyes received enucleation entirely due to other types of glaucoma. Failure to preserve the eyes for other reasons occurred in eight (6.1%) patients. At a median follow-up of 58.1 [IQR: 40.9-90.5] months, the systemic spread was detected in 45 (34.1%) patients, and 38 of them died. On multivariate analysis, tumor largest basal diameter (HR 1.15 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.31]), tumor non-response (HR 7.22 [95% CI: 2.63, 19.82]), and recurrence (HR 3.29 [95% CI: 1.54, 7.07]) were risk factors for metastasis. Increased age (HR 1.54 [95% CI: 1.07, 2.23]), tumor non-response (HR 7.91 [95% CI: 2.79, 22.48]), and recurrence (HR 3.08 [95% CI: 1.13, 7.23]) were risk factors for metastasis-related death. CONCLUSIONS: NVG was the major reason for secondary enucleation for Chinese UM patients after PRT. Tumor non-response and recurrence were associated with a significantly higher risk of long-term metastasis and metastasis-related death.

[Secondary open-angle glaucoma: pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, pigmentary glaucoma and neovascular glaucoma]. / Sekundäre Offenwinkelglaukome: Pseudoexfoliationsglaukom, Pigmentglaukom und Neovaskularisationsglaukom.

Secondary open-angle glaucomas are a heterogeneous group of diseases in which a variety of pathophysiological mechanisms result in an elevation of intraocular pressure. This article is the first part of a review of the more common forms of secondary open-angle glaucomas. The pathogenesis, characteristic clinical findings and treatment of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, pigmentary glaucoma and neovascular glaucoma are discussed. An emphasis is placed on the differences in treatment compared to primary open-angle glaucoma and prophylactic treatment approaches are explained where possible.

Case Report: Pediatric Ocular Ischemia and Neovascular Glaucoma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

SIGNIFICANCE: Neovascular glaucoma is an important subset of secondary glaucoma in neurofibromatosis patients. Vasculopathy of the ophthalmic circulation needs to be borne in mind while evaluating their etiology. PURPOSE: This study aimed to report the presentation, diagnostic work-up and management of an unusual case of neovascular glaucoma in a child. CASE REPORT: A 7-year-old boy presented with uniocular ischemic fundus and secondary neovascular glaucoma. Detailed family history and evaluation led to a diagnosis of familial neurofibromatosis type 1. Fundus fluorescein angiography revealed compromised retinal and choroidal circulations in the affected eye. Ocular ultrasound B scan and neuroimaging did not show any contributory lesions. Cardiovascular evaluation was within normal limits. Ophthalmic Doppler imaging revealed normal proximal ophthalmic arteries in both eyes; however, the central retinal artery of the affected eye showed low flow in its proximal part and absent flow in the distal part, as compared with the fellow eye showing regular flow until the optic disc margin. Corroborating the clinical, fundus fluorescein angiography and Doppler findings, a diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1-related vasculopathy of the distal ophthalmic artery was made. Poor visual prognosis for the affected eye was explained, and anterior retinal cryopexy along with cyclocryotherapy was performed to treat the neovascular glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: Vasculopathy of the ophthalmic circulation is an important cause of neovascular glaucoma in neurofibromatosis patients. The morphology of Lisch nodules may be altered in an ischemic eye, and therefore, careful examination of the other eye and systemic evaluation is vital in such unusual scenarios.

Neovascular Glaucoma in Children: A case series and a review of the literature.

PURPOSE: To study the uncommon causes and treatment options for neovascular glaucoma in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A review of the literature on neovascular glaucoma in children was conducted and we present three cases of neovascular glaucoma in children. RESULTS: We present three cases of neovascular glaucoma: two cases were secondary to a retinal vasoproliferative tumor-one to neurofibromatosis type 1 and the other to exudative retinopathy secondary to mild retinopathy of prematurity-and one case was secondary to a central retina vein occlusion secondary to an optic nerve glioma. Vision in the affected eye was severely impaired in all the children. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis and treatment of neovascular glaucoma in children is challenging and often a complication of a systemic or late-stage ocular condition. An appropriate diagnosis and estimation of the visual potential are essential to determine the correct treatment, especially in young children.